January 14th, 1985 is a noteworthy day for the United States military. Some would even call it dubious. On this day the United States Army adopted the Beretta 92F as their sidearm choice, designating it the M9. I will not delve into the politics of such a decision. That subject would be full of conjecture and, in some cases, anger. Let us just say that the 9mm Beretta won out over the Sig P226 due to cost issues and replaced the 1911 because civilians said it should.
The Beretta Model 92 is a 9mm semi-automatic pistol that has a double-action first trigger pull, followed by a single-action trigger pull for subsequent rounds. The "F" and "FS" (for Federal) models have a safety lever that also functions as a de-cocking lever. It is fed by a 15 round staggered detachable box magazine. The FS designation indicates an enlarged hammer pin that was the response to failures supposedly resulting from firing sub-machinegun rounds, more on this later.
Due to the sheer numbers that the military was ordering and the fact that these new pistols were being manufactured in Accokeek, Maryland it was a foregone conclusion that this pistol would be adopted by police departments (especially in Maryland). This was a major reason for the high capacity 9 mm becoming so popular in law enforcement. I have to say up front that I’ve never been a fan of the Beretta 92/M9. The ergonomics never suited me and I took umbrage to the replacement of the 1911 (especially since I enlisted in the NAVY in March 1985). That being said, the Beretta 92 was subjected to an enormous beating during the military trials including firing 35,000 rounds. Only the Sig Sauer and the Beretta passed all the qualifications. I know that many feel that S&W got shafted during the trials (and I agree) but that discussion could take and entire article all by its lonesome so I chose not to go into it here.
During the first phase of issue there were three reports of locking block failures by Navy Special Warfare Group operators with one civilian production pistol and two first production run 92s. The injuries were lacerations to the face and one broken tooth (nobody died). There have been “reports” of the Navy using sub-machine gun rounds that caused these failures. By all official accounts the rounds in question were standard M882 pistol ammunition firing a 124 grain bullet at 1113 feet per second. The Navy notified all branches of the military as well as Beretta and the Army began their own tests. Of the three civilian market M92SB pistols the Army had for testing, one was showing cracks. They continued to fire all three to failure with the cracked pistol firing 23,310 rounds before the slide let go and the other two reached 30,083 and 30,545 rounds. It was determined that there was a metallurgy issue with the Italian made slides. After finally admitting there was an issue, Beretta redesigned the locking block so that in the event of a failure, the slide would be unable to fly off the rails. No reports of this type of failure have been reported in any of the Maryland production guns.
This isn’t to say that there haven’t been some issues; the Berettas do require some basic maintenance and don’t particularly like cheap non-Beretta magazines. Some officers have had failure to feed and failure to eject problems. More often than not this has been traced back to a lack of cleaning and improper lubrication. Not that ANY officer would not take care of their primary firearm. As much as I say I don’t particularly life the Berettas, I have to admit that I’ve put thousands of rounds through them, with the exception of some bad ammunition, had never had any problems with reliability. I didn’t particularly like the first round double action trigger pull but replacing the main spring with the 92D (double action only) piece helped clean it up considerably.